Llc v. Llc’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently August 2020
3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Interstate Commerce Commission v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers · Irons v. Diamond · Brookens v. White · Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Federal Communications Commission · John Copanos and Sons Inc v. Food and Drug Administration
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A mistaken or inexact specification of the order to be reviewed will not be fatal to the petition, however, if the petitioner's intent to seek review of a specific order can be fairly inferred from the petition for review or from other contemporaneous filings, and the respondent is not misled by the mistake.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Failure to specify the correct order can result in dismissal of the petition.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“specify the order or part thereof to be reviewed.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.