Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 202 F.3d 454 - Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Successor in Interest to New England Merchants Leasing Corporation, Etc. v. Ogden Corporation

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Successor in Interest to New England Merchants Leasing Corporation, Etc. v. Ogden Corporation’s Empirical Analysis

202 F.3d 454 · 2000

Citation profile

92
cited by 92 later decisions
5
states following
September 2025
most recently cited

38 federal appellate · 21 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 92 later decisions — most recently September 2025 · most notably Teleglobe USA Inc. v. BCE Inc. (2007), Ramrez Rodrguez v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc

38 federal appellate · 21 district · 7 state decisions

660200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Upjohn Company v. United States · Quackenbush California Insurance Commissioner v. Allstate Insurance Co · Cobbledick v. United States · Church of Scientology of California v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 92 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Although a lower court's elucidation of its reasoning invariably eases the appellate task, motions often are decided summarily.... [W]e are aware of no authority that would allow us automatically to vary the standard of review depending on whether a district court has taken the time to explain its rationale.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “only upon a clear showing of manifest injustice, that is, where the lower court's discovery order was plainly wrong and resulted in substantial prejudice to the aggrieved party.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Under either approach, a substantial privilege claim that cannot effectively be tested by the privilege-holder through a contemptuous refusal ordinarily will qualify for immediate review if the claim otherwise would be lost.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.