Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 202 F.3d 611 - Kaye v. Grossman

Kaye v. Grossman’s Empirical Analysis

202 F.3d 611 · 2000

Citation profile

179
cited by 179 later decisions
May 2023
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 6 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 179 later decisions — most recently May 2023 · most notably Beth Israel Medical Center Nyu v. Horizon Blue Cross and Blue Shield of New Jersey Inc 04-5783-Cv (2006), Diesel Props S.r.l. v. Greystone Business Credit II LLC (2011)

7 federal appellate · 6 district ·

1110200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kregos v. Associated Press · Muller v. Costello · Readco Inc Rdp Xii v. Marine Midland Bank · Schlaifer Nance Company v. Estate of Andy Warhol W

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 179 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) that the defendant benefitted; (2) at the plaintiff's expense; and (3) that equity and good conscience require restitution.”
    14 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “1) a clear and unambiguous promise; 2) reasonable and foreseeable reliance on that promise; and 3) injury to the relying party as a result of the reliance.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.