United States v. Smith

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided October 5, 2006

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2006-10-05

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act)

Relies on United States of America v. Mitchell Ray Daugherty

Decided 2006-10-05

PER CURIAM: *

¶1 Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Carlos Ray Smith presents arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States v. Daugherty, 264 F.3d 513, 518 (5th Cir.2001), which rejected a Commerce Clause challenge to the felon-in-possession-of-a-firearm statute, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

¶2 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.