United States v. Drew

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided October 5, 2006

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2006-10-05

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 924

Relies on United States v. McCarty

Decided 2006-10-05

PER CURIAM: *

¶1 Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Chris Richard Drew raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. McCarty, 36 F.3d 1349, 1361 (5th Cir.1994), which held that the Double Jeopardy Clause does not bar punishments under both 18 U.S.C. §§ 924(c) and 2113(a) and (d). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

¶2 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.