Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

202 F. App'x 622

Roberson v. Graziano

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided October 13, 2006

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2006-10-13

Relies on Domino Sugar Corporation v. Sugar Workers Local Union of United Food and Commercial Workers International Union

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion · Decided 2006-10-13

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Cleven Lewis Roberson appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his civil complaint for insufficiency of service of process. * We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Roberson v. Graziano, No. 1:05-cv-02725-RDB (D.Md. filed Apr. 27, 2006 & entered Apr. 28, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 AFFIRMED.

*

¶3 Generally, dismissals without prejudice are interlocutory and not appealable. Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066 (4th Cir.1993). However, a dismissal without prejudice could be final if no amendment to the complaint would cure the defect in the plaintiff's case. Id. at 1066-67. We conclude that the order is appealable because the defect in this case (the failure to serve Defendant) can only be cured by something more than an amendment to the complaint.

/202/fappx/622 · .json · Public domain