Lundquist v. Coddington Bros.’s Empirical Analysis
1962
Citation profile
Relationships
Relies on Klingbeil v. Saucerman · Maryland Casualty Co. v. Beleznay · State Ex Rel. Koch v. Retirement Board of the Policemen's Annuity · State v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. · First Nat. Bank of Madison v. Kolbeck
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In Wisconsin the running of the statute of limitations absolutely extinguishes the cause of action for in Wisconsin limitations are not treated as statutes of repose. The limitation of actions is a right as well as a remedy, extinguishing the right on one side and creating a right on the other, which is as of high dignity as regards judicial remedies as any other right and it is a right which enjoys constitutional protection.” (emphasis added)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.