Singer v. Progressive Care, SC’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 31 U.S.C. § 3729 (False Claims Act) · 31 U.S.C. § 3730 (False Claims Act) · 31 U.S.C. § 3731 (False Claims Act) · 42 U.S.C. § 1395 (§ 1801 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Ashcroft v. Iqbal · State of New Hampshire v. State of Maine · Wright v. Associated Insurance Companies Inc. · Brazinski v. Amoco Petroleum Additives Co. · Bankers Trust Company v. Old Republic Insurance Company
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Without finding that the Plaintiff has sufficiently pled the claims for reimbursement were fraudulent or ever presented to the government, the Court cannot conclude that the allegations support a finding that Plaintiff was acting in furtherance of an FCA enforcement action or other efforts to stop violations of the FCA.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Because Singer has failed to state [an FCA fraud claim], his FCA retaliation claim fails as well.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.