Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

202 Ill. App. 486

People v. Seed

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 13, 1916

Appellate Court of Illinois · decided 1916-10-13

<p>Abstract of the Decision.</p> <p>1. Husband and wife, § 274*—what proof necessary to warrant conviction of wife abandonment. In order to warrant a conviction for wife abandonment, the proof must show such a state of facts as would, if they continued for the period of two years, warrant the granting of a divorce to the wife on the ground of desertion.</p> <p>2. Husband and wife, § 273*—what is a defense to prosecution for wife abandonment. If the separation of husband and wife is due to the desertion of the husband by the wife, or if it is by mutual agreement of the parties, the husband cannot be held amenable to the criminal law or be held guilty of desertion.</p> <p>3. Husband and wife, § 274*—when evidence insufficient to justify conviction for wife abandonment. On a prosecution for wife abandonment, evidence showing, among other things, that the defendant, a traveling insurance solicitor, leased and maintained a house after his wife had gone to visit her relatives, and told her that when she was ready to come home he would come after her, that after several months, on the wife’s not returning, he surrendered the lease and the wife stated on the witness stand that if the defendant had done what was right she would have been willing to live with him, held not to justify a conviction.</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 1944

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Reversed · Decided 1916-10-13

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Mr. Justice Graves

¶1delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Husband and wife, § 273*—what is a defense to prosecution for wife abandonment. If the separation of husband and wife is due to the desertion of the husband by the wife, or if it is by mutual agreement of the parties, the husband cannot be held amenable to the criminal law or be held guilty of desertion.3. Husband and wife, § 274*—when evidence insufficient to justify conviction for wife abandonment. On a prosecution for wife abandonment, evidence showing, among other things, that the defendant, a traveling insurance solicitor, leased and maintained a house after his wife had gone to visit her relatives, and told her that when she was ready to come home he would come after her, that after several months, on the wife’s not returning, he surrendered the lease and the wife stated on the witness stand that if the defendant had done what was right she would have been willing to live with him, held not to justify a conviction.
/202/illapp/486 · .json · Public domain