202 Ill. App. 3d 581 - People v. Iseminger’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
April 2023
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Tucker · United States v. Grayson · Roberts v. United States · Wasman v. United States · 88 Ill. 2d 482 - People v. La Pointe
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Even if the defendant’s revealing [the sources of his narcotics] proved insufficient (as is likely to be the case) to assist law enforcement authorities in any way other than to provide them with information as to current drug trafficking in a particular area, the fact that defendant revealed the names of the people providing him with drugs is likely to strain his relations with those people. A benefit of these strained relations may be that defendant in the future might have difficulty obtaining drugs, thereby making it easier for him to 'go straight.’ ” Iseminger, 202 Ill. App. 3d at 600-01 , 560 N.E.2d at 457 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“"By declining to cooperate, [defendant] rejected an 'obligatio[n] of community life’ that should be recognized before rehabilitation can begin. [Citation.] Moreover, [defendant’s] refusal to cooperate protected his former partners in crime, thereby preserving his ability to resume criminal activities upon release.” Roberts v. United States, 445 U.S. 552, 558 , 63 L. Ed. 2d 622, 629 , 100 S. Ct. 1358, 1363 (1980).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[i]t simply makes no sense to urge trial courts to take every reasonable step to prepare themselves appropriately for their important sentencing decisions, and then to cut them off from the best source of information.” Iseminger, 202 Ill. App. 3d at 599 , 560 N.E.2d at 456 . Thus, we held that the trial court may properly ask questions of a defendant at his sentencing hearing, and”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.