Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 202 Ind. 397 - State Ex Rel. Lopez v. Killigrew

State Ex Rel. Lopez v. Killigrew’s Empirical Analysis

1931

Citation profile

61
cited by 61 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
14
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

57 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 61 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2018 · most notably Green v. United States (1957), Williams v. Tharp (2009)

57 state decisions — followed in 14 states

140193119401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Clarence Murphy v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts · Sanders v. State · Murphy v. Commonwealth · Jonas Grossmayer · Wheeler v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Since we conclude that the legal consequence of granting a writ of error coram nobis is to place ‘the parties in the same position as if no trial had been had,’ it follows that if the criminal court of Lake County, after a hearing on the merits of relator’s petition, should grant a writ of error coram nobis, the relator will not be able, in the new trial, to get any advantage from the fact that he has discharged the judgment of the original trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““. . . We find no difficulty in deciding that the' relator, if put on trial a second time, cannot avail himself of the fact that he has discharged the judgment of the original trial.” '”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.