State v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis
1969
Citation profile
36 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently July 1989 · most notably State v. Bell (1977), State v. Ruscoe (1989)
36 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Tibbett v. Hand · Merry Manufacturing Co. v. Burns Tool Co. · State v. Emory · Ray v. State · State v. Rice
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“. An indigent defendant may not compel the court to appoint such counsel as defendant may choose. Such appointment lies within the sound discretion of the trial court . . Likewise, whether the dissatisfaction of an indigent accused with his court-appointed counsel warrants discharge of that counsel and appointment of new counsel is for the trial court, in its discretion, to decide”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Way · State v. Salazar““Appellant contends the trial court erred in receiving in evidence the items seized at appellant’s apartment because the warrants were not constitutionally specific as to the premises to be searched or the property to be seized. As to the latter, the affidavit for the search warrant and the search warrant described the property to be seized as ‘cooking utensils,’ which we think was sufficient. . . .” (479.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Brown““. . . Likewise, whether the dissatisfaction of an indigent accused with his court-appointed counsel warrants discharge of that counsel and appointment of new counsel is for the trial court, in its discretion, to decide. . . .” (p. 477).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Kirk
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.