State v. Hooks’s Empirical Analysis
1968
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently September 2005
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · Fay v. Noia · Pointer v. Texas · Henry v. State of Mississippi · Brookhart v. Janis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The Sixth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States provides that ‘In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right ... to be confronted with the witnesses against him.’ In Pointer v. Texas, 380 U. S. 400 , 13 L. Ed. 2d 923 , 85 S. Ct. 1065 , the Supreme Court held this right is a fundamental right and is made obligatory on the states by the Fourteenth Amendment. “Similarly, § 10 of the Bill of Rights of the Kansas Constitution secures to the accused in all criminal prosecutions the right ‘to meet the witness face to face.’ This provision was dealt with by this court in the early case of State v. Tomblin, 57 Kan. 841 , 48 Pac. 144 . . . .” (p. 70.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Wilkins
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.