Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 202 KY 760 - Grapes v. Commonwealth

Grapes v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1924

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
February 1972
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently February 1972

3 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

30192419301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ratliff v. Commonwealth · Howard v. Commonwealth · Commonwealth v. Hargis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is the law in this Commonwealth that the principal actor, aiders and abettors, and accessories before the fact, are all parties in the first degree and are equally guilty and may be so accused and convicted. ’ ’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.