Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 202 La. 486 - Keller v. Haas

Keller v. Haas’s Empirical Analysis

1943

Citation profile

100
cited by 100 later decisions
1
states following
September 2012
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 90 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 100 later decisions — most recently September 2012 · most notably 310 So. 2d 806 - Noe v. Roussel (1975), Kingsman Enterprises, Inc. v. Bakerfield Elec. Co., Inc. (1976)

4 federal appellate · 90 state decisions

26019431950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Duson v. Roos · Heard v. Monroe Sand & Gravel Co. · Alliance Trust Co. v. Streater · Skannal v. Hespeth · Hebert v. Champagne

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 100 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is well settled that where an individual forms a corporation of which he is the sole and only stockholder or owns such control of the stock that the act of the corporation is his own, then he may not use the screen of corporate entity to absolve himself from responsibility.””
    13 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.