Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 202 Md. 547 - Johnson v. Johnson

Johnson v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1953

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
3
states following
October 2001
most recently cited

29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently October 2001 · most notably Zouck v. Zouck (1990), Turrisi v. Sanzaro (1987)

29 state decisions

100195319601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Estin v. Estin · Esenwein v. Commonwealth ex rel. Esenwein · Geach v. Illinois · Lynn v. Lynn · Emerson v. Emerson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““* * * [U]nless an a vinculo decree either awards alimony, or reserves jurisdiction, the Court is powerless, after the decree has become enrolled, to award alimony. Under [Marshall], if the Court awarded alimony of one cent a year, it could at any time, years later perhaps, require the husband if his circumstances warranted it, to pay $10,000.00 a year. Also, by adding four words — ‘The Court retains jurisdiction’ — alimony could be given for the first time 20 years after the decree.””
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.