Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 202 MICH 457 - Whitman v. Branstrom

Whitman v. Branstrom’s Empirical Analysis

1918

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
December 1918
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Thomas v. Rosecrantz · State ex rel. Hansen v. Carrico

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The statute contemplates that the party is not yet in contempt, and could not be, under our statutes and decisions until he had had a hearing in court.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““An act to facilitate the collection of temporary and permanent alimony ordered to be paid in suits for divorce.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.