Young v. Phillips’s Empirical Analysis
1918
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 3 district · 11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently November 1930
2 federal appellate · 3 district · 11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Atkinson v. Japink · Luce v. Stott Realty Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““That the title to said property and right of possession thereto shall be and remain in said first party until said sum of $750 [the purchase price] and interest, and any judgment rendered therefor shall be paid in full.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““When the absolute title is reserved, retention thereof by the vendor is inconsistent with an action to recover the debt.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.