¶1This is a motion pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act.
¶2*11A year ago February the petitioner took a promotional examination No. 1231 and entitled “ Tax Administrative Supervisor — Corporation ’ ’. Concededly he received from the monitor no oral instructions. Neither, according to his contention, did he receive the first sheet of the examination, which contained these instructions:
¶3Question Booklet
¶4(Morning Session)
¶5New York State Department op Civil Service
¶6February 17, 1951 Identification No.........
¶7Written Test
¶8Exam. No.'*
¶9Examination Title
¶10Entrance Salary
¶11Department or Jurisdiction
¶121226 Senior Corporation Tax
¶13Examiner $3978
¶141227 Associate Corporation
¶15Tax Examiner $4836
¶161230 Tax Administrative
¶17Supervisor (Corporation) $5430
¶181231 Tax Administrative
¶19Supervisor (Corporation) $5430
¶20* Put a check mark (V) in this column before each examination in which you are competing. You may compete only in examinations for which you were notified to appear.
¶21Time Allowed
¶22Exam. No.
¶23Questions to be Answered Morning Session
¶24Apternoon Session
¶254 Hours 1226 Questions 1 to and including 90
¶264 Hours 1227 Questions 31 to and including 120
¶274 Hours 1230 Questions 31 to and including 120
¶284 Hours 1231 Questions 31 to and including 120
¶29afternoon sessession. sion will begin at 2 P.M. Candidates may leave for lunch after turning in their papers for the morn-
¶30Candidates for 1227 and either 1230 or 1231 will be allowed 4 hours.
¶31All questions for the morning session of these written tests are contained in this Question Booklet of 28 pages, including this page. If any page is missing or incomplete, obtain a new Question Booklet from the Monitor.
¶32Department of Taxation and Finance
¶33*12It will be observed that at the morning session candidates for senior corporation tax examiner were to answer “ Questions 1 to and including 90 ’ ’ and candidates, of whom the petitioner was one, for the remaining three examinations were to answer “ Questions 31 to and including 120.”
¶34The first examination sheet containing questions begins: “ Candidates for #1226 Senior Corporation Tax Examiner
¶35Begin Here.
¶36“ 1. Which one of the following is subject to a New York State franchise tax under Article 9-A? …
¶37Despite this instruction the petitioner answered questions 1 to and including 30.
¶38After question 30 appeared the following legend: “ Candidates for #1227 Associate Corporation Tax Examiner and #1230 and #1231 Tax Administrative Supervisor (Corporation), Begin Here.”
¶39The petitioner’s counsel states in his memorandum that the petitioner “ then destroyed the answer sheet containing the answers to these 30 questions, obtained a new question answer sheet from the Proctor and started anew with question No. 30.”
¶40The petitioner answered questions 30 to and including 90. After question 90 appeared the following instructions:
¶41End of Morning Session for #1226 Senior Corporation Tax Examiner Only.
¶42End of Morning Session
¶43As soon as you finish, the morning session, enter the “ Time Finished ” in the space provided on the front of the separate Answer Sheet. Arrange your papers with your Identification Sheet on top, your Question Booklet next, and your Answer Sheet last. Signal the Monitor to collect your papers and special pencil. Do not surrender your papers until he has cheeked them, because you are responsible for seeing that he collects all your papers and the special pencil.
¶44Candidates for #1227 Associate Corporation Tax Examiner and #1230 and #1231 Tax Administrative Supervisor (Corporation) Continue.
¶45All Candidates Must Return for the Afternoon Session Which Will Begin Promptly at 2 P.M.
¶46Despite these instructions the petitioner left the examination room, later returned and stated to a district supervisor of the commission that he had been misled by the legend appearing after question 90. He was permitted to answer questions 90 to and including 120 on signing the following agreement:
¶47“ Through inadvertence, at the morning Session this morning, (Feb 17 1951) I did not complete all the answers to the *13Multiple Answer problems, although I had more than one hour in which to do so.
¶48“ After answering Question, (I think it was 90) I read a notation to the effect that this completed the morning examination, and accordingly turned in my paper, having more than an hour still available.
¶49“ However, at lunch I subsequently found out, that it was the end of the examination only for Senior Examiner, and that the examination (# 1231 Tax Admin. Supervisor Corp.) was continued several pages later.
¶50‘ ‘ I did not discuss the content of the last 30 questions either et lunch or since that time, and I will submit an affidavit to that effect if necessary.
¶51“ If I am permitted to complete the morning session of this examination in what would be the time remaining, I agree that the acceptance of these last 30 questions will rest with the Commission — State Civil Service Commission.”
¶52It may be observed that the petitioner’s statement is: “I did not complete all the answers … , although I had more than one hour to do so.” It may further be observed that there is no denial of paragraph “ 12 ” of the answer that the petitioner answered the previously omitted questions, 90 through 120, in fifty-seven minutes. Consequently this new matter must be deemed admitted. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1292; Entress v. Sours, 272 App. Div. 861.) So there is present no question of prejudice through loss of time consumed by the petitioner’s error in answering the first thirty questions and the petitioner makes no such complaint. His prayer is based on the alleged misleading character of the instructions following the ninetieth question.
¶53He asks for an order:
¶54“ 1. Directing the New York State Civil Service Commission to grade petitioner’s answers to questions numbered 91 to 120 of the examination taken by petitioner on February 17th, 1951 titled ‘ Tax Administrative Supervisor — Corporations ’.
¶55“ 2. Directing the New York State Civil Service Commission, after grading petitioner’s answers to questions 91 to 120 to adjust petitioner’s final mark on the final written examination to include credit for correct answers to those questions.
¶56“ 3. Directing the New York State Civil Service Commission to place petitioner’s name on the eligibility list in accordance with his adjusted final mark;”
¶57*14When the petitioner completed his answer to question 30 he observed the statement
¶58“ Candidates for #1227 Associate Corporation Tax Examiner and #1230 and #1231 Tax Administrative Supervisor (Corporation), Begin Here.”
¶59At that time, having asked for a new examination sheet, he knew indubitably he was taking the examination for “Tax Administrative Supervisor (Corporation) ” and not the examination for “ Senior Corporation Tax Examiner ”. After he answered question 90 he says he was misled by:
¶60End op Morning Session for #1226 Senior Corporation Tax Examiner Only. End op Morning Session
¶61As soon as you finish the morning session, enter the “ Time Finished ” in the space provided on the front of the separate Answer Sheet. Arrange your papers with your Identification Sheet on top, your Question Booklet next, and your Answer Sheet last. Signal the Monitor to collect your papers and special pencil. Do not surrender your papers until he has cheeked them, because you are responsible for seeing that he collects all your papers and the special pencil.
¶62The petitioner then knew he was not taking the examination for Senior Corporation Tax Examiner and the instruction specifically used the words ‘ ‘ Senior Corporation Tax Examiner ’ ’ and “ Only”. The petitioner holds the degrees of bachelor and master in commercial science and he is registered to practice before the United States Treasury Department and the United States Tax Board. Concededly he already had been put on notice by the instruction following question 30. And the instructions after question 90 and the following “ End … for … Tax Examiner Only ” contained the additional instruction:
¶63“ Candidates for #1227 Associate Corporation Tax Examiner and #1230 and #1231 Tax Administrative Supervisor (Corporation) Continue. All Candidates Must Return for the Afternoon Session Which Will Begin Promptly at 2 p. m.”
¶64The petitioner appealed to the Civil Service Commission for a review and his appeal was denied. No testimony was taken. It was immaterial whether or not it was the district supervisor’s “ belief that petitioner had not discussed the questions prior to returning to the examination room ” as alleged in paragraph “ 9 ” of the petition. The denial by the commission was an administrative decision, which cannot be said to be “ arbitrary ”, “ unwarranted ”, “ unreasonable ” or “ capricious ” so as to bring about judicial interference. The judicial function is *15exhausted when there is found ,to he rational basis for the conclusions of the administrative body. (Rochester Tel. Corp. v. United States, 307 U. S. 125, 146; Matter of Kopec v. Buffalo Brake Beam-Acme Steel & Malleable Iron Works, 304 N. Y. 65, 71.) And “ relief in the nature of mandamus may only be awarded upon the establishment of a clear legal right thereto.” (Matter of Marks v. Regents, 279 App. Div. 476, 478.) It can be argued and believed by fair-minded men that the determination of the commission was, in all the circumstances, not ‘ ‘ unreasonable ” Saying this marks the end of the inquiry. (Matter of Commercial Pictures Corp. v. Board of Regents, 280 App. Div. 260, in which the dissent was concerned not with the validity or interpretation of the rule but with the question of its applicability in the circumstances disclosed.)
¶65After adoption of the petitioner’s proof the petitioner’s prayer for relief must be denied on the law.
¶66An order may be submitted on five days ’ notice.