202 Mo. App. 176 - Winner v. Chucart’s Empirical Analysis
1919
Citation profile
27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently September 1984 · most notably Kelly v. Kelly (1932), Laumeier v. Laumeier (1925)
27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Plaster v. Plaster · Biffle v. Pullam · Buckminster v. Buckminster · Zilley v. Dunwiddie · Holt v. Holt
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Nor was the plaintiff required to apply to the court wherein the divorce was granted for a modification of that decree before she could enforce her right to recover. In the first place, the decree was silent as to maintenance. Her demand for necessaries furnished does not contravene any of the terms of that decree.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Kelly v. Kelly“where the *Page 1000 decree (of divorce) was silent on the question of maintenance, plaintiff could maintain the present (independent) action, independent of the divorce proceeding, and recover;”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Kelly v. Kelly
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.