Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

202 N.C. 809

164 S.E 337

State v. . Livingston

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 15, 1932

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1932-06-15

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

““Confessions are either voluntary or involuntary. They are called voluntary when made neither under the influence of hope or fear, but are attributable to that love of truth which predominates in the-breast of every man, not operated upon by other motives more powerful with him, and which, it is said, in the perfectly good man cannot be countervailed. These confessions are the highest evidences of truth, even in cases affecting life. But it is said, and said with truth, that confessions induced by hope or extorted by fear are, of all kinds of evidence, the least to be relied on, and are therefore entirely to be rejected. . . .””

quoted by 1 later decision, including State v. Pruitt

“a confession wrung from the mind by the flattery of hope, or by the torture of fear, comes in such questionable shape as to merit no consideration)”

quoted by 1 later decision, including 156 N.C. App. 235 - State v. Carmon

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1932-06-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently January 2017

20 state decisions

60193219401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Stact, C. J.

¶1 The confession of the defendants made under the inducement that the chances were “it would be lighter on them” if they would say they got the property, coupled with the remark of the officer, “it looks like you had about as well tell it,” must be regarded as arising out of circumstances which render it involuntary, and, therefore, incompetent as evidence against appellant. S. v. Myers, ante, 381; S. v. Whitener, 191 N. C., 659, 132 S. E., 603; S. v. Jones, 145 N. C., 466, 59 S. E., 353; S. v. Horner, 139 N. C., 603, 52 S. E., 136.

¶2 Almost the identical question here presented, certainly the same in principle, was decided in S. v. Davis, 125 N. C., 612, 34 S. E., 198, S. v. Drake, 82 N. C., 593, S. v. Dildy, 72 N. C., 325, S. v. Whitfield, 70 N. C., 356, S. v. Matthews, 66 N. C., 106, S. v. Lawhorne, 66 N. C., 638.

¶3 A free and voluntary confession is deserving of the highest credit, because it is presumed to flow from the strongest sense of guilt, but a confession wrung from the mind by the flattery of hope, or by the torture of fear, comes in such questionable shape as to merit no consideration. S. v. Patrick, 48 N. C., 443.

¶4 Speaking to the subject in S. v. Roberts, 12 N. C., 259, Henderson, J., said: “Confessions are either voluntary or involuntary. They are called voluntary when made neither under the influence of hope or fear, but are attributable to that love of truth which predominates in the breast of every man, not operated upon by other motives more powerful with him, and which, it is said, in the perfectly good man cannot be countervailed. These confessions are the highest evidences of truth, even in cases affecting life. But it is said, and said with truth, that confessions induced by hope or extorted by fear are, of all kinds of evidence, the least to be relied on, and are therefore entirely to be rejected.”

¶5 Voluntary confessions are admissible in evidence against the party making them; involuntary confessions are not. A confession is voluntary in law when — and only when — it was in fact voluntarily made. S. v. Newsome, 195 N. C., 552, 143 S. E., 187.

¶6 New trial.

/202/nc/809 · .json · Public domain