¶1 A consideration of the record proper, to which we are limited in the absence of a statement of case on appeal, In re Bank, ante, 251; Casualty Co. v. Green, 200 N. C., 535, 157 S. E., 797, does not show that appellant has overcome the presumption against error. Bailey v. McKay, 198 N. C., 638, 152 S. E., 893. To prevail on appeal, he who alleges error must successfully handle the laboring oar. Mangum v. Winstead, ante, 252; Frazier v. R. R., ante, 11.
¶2 Affirmed.