Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

202 N.C. 856

164 S.E 338

Bechtel v. . Weaver

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 15, 1932

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1932-06-15

Decided 1932-06-15

Per Curiam.

¶1 If it be conceded that the defendants’ plea in abatement should have been sustained (Brown v. Polk, 201 N. C., 375, 160 S. E., 357), still the correct result has been reached in another way, and the judgment will not be disturbed. Bank v. McCullers, 201 N. C., 440; Rankin v. Oates, 183 N. C., 517, 112 S. E., 32. “A new trial will not he granted when the action of the trial judge, even if erroneous, could by no possibility injure the appellant.” Butts v. Screws, 95 N. C., 215.

¶2 This disposition of the matter renders it unnecessary to consider defendants’ appeal.

¶3 Affirmed.

/202/nc/856 · .json · Public domain