Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 202 Neb. 141 - West v. Janing

West v. Janing’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
October 1985
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Bouie v. City of Columbia · Michigan v. Doran · Austin v. Brumbaugh · 74 Wis. 2d 227 - State v. Ritter · State of Kansas v. Holeb

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A governor’s grant of extradition is prima facie evidence that the constitutional and statutory requirements have been met. Cf. Bassing v. Cady, 208 U.S. 386, 392 [ 28 S. Ct. 392 , 52 L. Ed. 540 ] (1908). Once the governor has granted extradition, a court considering release on habeas corpus can do no more than decide (a) whether the extradition documents on their face are in order; (b) whether the petitioner has been charged with a crime in the demanding state; (c) whether the petitioner is the person named in the request for extradition; and (d) whether the petitioner is a fugitive.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.