State v. Rosales’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
October 2013
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Crane v. Kentucky · United States v. Shay · Hisenaj v. Kuehner · State v. J.Q.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the intended testimony must concern a subject matter that is beyond the ken of the average juror; (2) the field testified to must be at a state of the art such that an expert's testimony could be sufficiently reliable; and (3) the witness must have sufficient expertise to offer the intended testimony.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education may testify thereto in the form of an opinion or otherwise.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.