State v. Sapienza’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
February 2002
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Procter & Gamble Co. · State v. Johnson · State v. Sugar · State v. Abbati · State v. Lynch
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Before a dismissal of an indictment is warranted in such circumstances, we believe there must be a finding of intention inconsistent with fair play and therefore inconsistent with due process or an egregious carelessness or prosecutorial excess tantamount to suppression. In the absence of these conditions the right of the public to its day in court in the prosecution of properly found indictments should be forfeited only if otherwise there would be manifest and harmful prejudice to defendant. [ Laganella, supra, 144 N.J.Super. at 282-83 , 365 A. 2d 224 ; State v. Sapienza, 202 N.J.Super. 282, 287 , 494 A. 2d 849 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 102 N.J. 312 , 508 A. 2d 195 (1985).]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.