Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 202 N.Y. 34 - Fults v. . Munro

Fults v. . Munro’s Empirical Analysis

1911

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
5
states following
December 1974
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 35 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently December 1974 · most notably General Electric Co. v. R. H. Macy & Co. (1951), Crow v. Davidson (1939)

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 35 state decisions

1001911192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Colt v. Eves · 12 E.H. Smith 587 - Sherman v. . Foster · Welsh v. . Cochran · Hyatt v. Wood · Wood v. . Phillips

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The force used must be unusual and tend to bring about a breach of the peace, such as an entry with a strong hand, or a multitude of people, or in a riotous manner, or with personal violence, or with threat and menace to life or limb, or under circumstances which would naturally inspire fear and lead one to apprehend danger of personal injury if he stood up in defense of his possession.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “if a person is disseized, ejected, or put out of real property, in a forcible manner; or, after he has been put out, is held and kept out, by force, or by putting him in fear of personal violence, he is entitled to recover treble damages, in an action therefor against the wrong-doer.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “although the entry was peaceable, still if the plaintiff was kept out through fear of personal violence, she was entitled to recover treble damages for a forcible detainer,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.