Schwartz v. McDaniel’s Empirical Analysis
1950
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently March 1994
2 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Howard v. Manning · Bates v. Rogers · Campbell v. John Deere Plow Co. · Sullivan v. Bryant · Pharaoh & Co. v. Sies
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Under the Community Property Act, Title 32, chap. 1, sections 1 and 2, S.L.1945, the property of either husband or wife owned or claimed by them prior to the effective date of the Act remained, upon the adoption of the Act, their separate property although acquired after marriage.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““Agency may be implied from conduct of a party and the circumstances in a particular case, and one who leads an innocent party to rely on the appearance of another’s authority to act for him will not be heard to deny the agency to that party’s prejudice.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Remmert v. Cooper“led the [third party] to believe that she was authorized as his agent to lease the land”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.