Chance v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently August 1988
1 federal appellate · 11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 75 So. 2d 291 - Melton v. State · Romanello v. State · 156 So. 2d 534 - Range v. State · Johnson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) a purpose or intention to effect an arrest under real or pretended authority; (b) an actual or constructive seizure or detention of one person by another having present power to control the person arrested; (c) a communication by the person making the arrest to the person whose arrest is sought, of an intention or purpose then and there to effect an arrest; and (d) an understanding by the person whose arrest is sought that it is the intention of the arresting officer then and there to arrest and detain him.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bey v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.