Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 202 SO2D 852 - Johnson v. State

Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
February 2021
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2021

2 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

601967197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Machibroda v. United States · In Re Cregler · Dutton Phosphate Co. v. Priest · Ex Parte Wise · 191 So. 2d 33 - State Ex Rel. Lee v. Buchanan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “by wandering and strolling around from place to place without any lawful purpose or object,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “Rogues and vagabonds, or dissolute persons who go about begging, common gamblers, persons who use juggling or unlawful games or plays, common drunkards, common night walkers, thieves, pilferers or pick-pockets, traders in stolen property, lewd, wanton and lascivious persons, keepers of gambling places, common railers and brawlers, persons wandering or strolling around from place to place without any lawful purpose or object, habitual loafers, disorderly persons, persons neglecting all lawful business and habitually spending their time by frequenting houses of ill fame, gaming houses or places where alcoholic beverages are sold or served, persons able to work but habitually living upon the earnings of their wives or minor children, shall be deemed vagrants and, upon conviction in the Municipal Court shall be punished as provided for class D offenses.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “"* * * appears to be of the genre of vagrancy laws which have long been upheld as necessary regulations to deter vagabondage and prevent crimes and the imposition upon society of able bodied irresponsibles who of their own volition become burdens upon others and particularly on their families for support."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.