Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 202 SO2D 883 - Thomas v. State

Thomas v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
4
states following
June 2007
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently June 2007

15 state decisions

8019671970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Gargano · Gray v. State · 153 Tex. Crim. 29 - Cameron v. State · Moore v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"As a general rule, it is improper for a prosecuting attorney to disclose during trial that another defendant had been convicted or has pleaded guilty. This is because competent and satisfactory evidence against one person charged with an offense is not necessarily so against another person charged with the same offense. Each person charged with the commission of an offense must be tried upon evidence legally tending to show his guilt or innocence. See State v. Gargano, 99 Conn. 103 , 121 A. 657 (1923); Gray v. State, 221 Md. 286 , 157 A.2d 261 (1960); Cameron v. State, 153 Tex.Cr. R. 29, 217 S.W.2d 23 ; Annotation, 48 A.L.R.2d 1017 ."”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.