Contreras v. Vesper’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 192 So. 3d 153 - Tomlinson v. Landmark American Insurance Co. · 91 So. 3d 1073 - Gaten v. Tangipahoa Parish School System · 76 So. 3d 100 - Babin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance · 188 So. 3d 484 - Holland v. Holland
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“one must refer to the motion for summary judgment and assume that the relief granted by the judgment is that prayed for in the motion.... [A] judgment cannot require reference to extrinsic documents or pleadings in order to discern the court's ruling.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[a] judgment that simply states that a defendant's motion for summary judgment is granted, is defective and cannot be considered a final judgment.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“It is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the Motion for Summary Judgment filed herein on behalf of Defendant, PCF is granted”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.