C.E.C. v. C.W.C.’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Nunn v. Baker · Cates v. Bush · 828 So. 2d 935 - Eubanks v. McCollum · 42 So. 3d 1280 - Sexton v. Sexton · 959 So. 2d 640 - Hamilton Ex Rel. Slate-Hamilton v. Connally
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“not determine[d] custody of the child, dismiss[ed] the petition for adoption, or otherwise resolve[d] the entire adoption proceeding.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“jurisdictional matters are of such magnitude that we take notice of them at any time and do so even ex mero motu '').”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.