Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

202 S.W.3d 35

State v. MISRA

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 19, 2006

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2006-09-19

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently January 2008

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2006-09-19

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2 Defendant appeals from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of second-degree assault, in violation of section 565.060 RSMo (2000), and armed criminal action, in violation of section 571.015 RSMo (2000), arising out of a stab *36 bing. The jury assessed a sentence of one day in the county jail on the assault count and three years imprisonment on the armed criminal action count, and the trial court sentenced defendant to serve these terms concurrently.

¶3 No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

¶4 The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

/202/sw3d/35 · .json · Public domain