State of Missouri v. State of Illinois’s Empirical Analysis
202 U.S. 598 · 1906
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 5 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently July 1965
3 federal appellate · 5 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Nebraska v. Iowa · State of Missouri v. State of Illinois · Sanborn v. United States · The State of Pennsylvania v. The Wheeling and Belmont Bridge Company
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““there is no reason why the plaintiff should not suffer the usual conse- ■ quence of failure to establish its • case.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Reynolds v. Wade
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.