Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 202 VA 335 - Kirk v. Carter

Kirk v. Carter’s Empirical Analysis

1960

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 2009
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Penick v. Ratcliffe · Richardson v. Farrar

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a simple refusal to hear and decide the case; and this [C]ourt having held that no appeal lies from such refusal, it is exactly the case to which the highly remedial writ of mandamus is most frequently applied, in order to prevent a defect or failure of justice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[i]n judging of such election or return, the court shall proceed on the merits thereof and decide the same according to the [C]onstitution and laws,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “to require the three-judge court . . . to hear and determine an election contest . . . instituted by the petitioners.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.