Monka v. State Conservation Commission’s Empirical Analysis
1930
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently May 1994
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ferguson v. . Ross · Milwaukee County v. Isenring · Bittenhaus v. Johnston · Krenz v. Nichols · State ex rel. Hammann v. Levitan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“. . .a bill which merely imposes a burden or confers a benefit upon specified persons or localities, which do not constitute a legitimate class for the purpose of general legislation under the established principles of classification of cities for such purpose.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““No private or local bill which may be passed by the legislature shall embrace more than one subject, and that shall be expressed in the title.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.