202 Wis. 2d 694 - State v. Holloway’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently March 2019
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 102 Wis. 2d 461 - Grobarchik v. State · 76 Wis. 2d 277 - Cunningham v. State · 172 Wis. 2d 257 - State v. Thompson · 165 Wis. 2d 102 - State v. Wilks · 185 Wis. 2d 549 - State v. Zimmerman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“On the issue before us, § 973.13, Stats., is more remarkable for what it does not say than what it does. The statute clearly invalidates the excess portion of an enhanced repeater sentence which is not properly proven [and in excess of the maximum penalty] .... However, the statute does not otherwise address other components or conditions of the sentence which do not directly bear upon the duration of the term imposed. Sentences are to be individualized to meet the facts of the particular case and the characteristics of the individual defendant.... We should not restrict the discretionary authority of a court at resentencing when the underlying premise for an original sentence no longer exists. Resentencing is generally the proper method of correcting a sentencing error.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“In any case where the court imposes a maximum penalty in excess of that authorized by law, such excess shall be void and the sentence shall be valid only to the extent of the maximum term authorized by statute and shall stand commuted without further proceedings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Volk“the premise and goals of the prior sentence have been frustrated.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Volk
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.