202 W. Va. 198 - Guido v. Guido’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

10 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “First, the party must have suffered an “injury-in-fact” — an invasion of a legally protected interest. Second, there must be a causal connection between the injury and the conduct forming the basis of action. Third, it must be likely that the injury will be redressed through a favorable decision of the court.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 219 W. Va. 112 - McConaha v. Rust

2. “In the instant matter it is quite clear that Mr. Guido lacks standing to bring any appeal issues which directly involve his parents. He has no justiciable interest in the claims of his parents.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 216 W. Va. 99 - State Ex Rel. Abraham Linc. Corp. v. Bedell

3. “To be appealable, therefore, an order either must be a final order or an interlocutory order approximating a final order in its nature and effect.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 220 W. Va. 660 - Walker v. Option One Mortgage Corp.