v. Kent’s Empirical Analysis
2020
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Nathan DUNLAP, Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee v. The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant. · People v. Garcia · People v. Jimenez · People v. DIST. CT. IN & FOR THIRD JUD. DIST. · People v. District Court of Colorado's Seventeenth Judicial District
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is manifestly arbitrary, unreasonable, or unfair.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“actual facts and evidence in the record supporting the contention.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“in deciding whether special circumstances render a fair trial unlikely, a court need not (and ordinarily should not) evaluate the facts before it in isolation but rather may properly consider all of those facts together to determine whether a defendant will receive a fair trial.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.