2020 OK CR 7 - FRAZIER v. STATE’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

3 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “While the crime of felon in possession is complete upon a convicted felon being in possession, either personally or constructively, of a weapon, it is the individual's further actions that dictate whether additional criminal charges may arise from those acts.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. BRINK v. STATE

2. “[u]nder the reasoning of Sanders , possession of the same firearm, with no evidence of a temporal break between the individual acts, resulted in three charges and punishments in this case for the same act.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. BRINK v. STATE

3. “focus[es] on the relationship between the crimes, considering '(1) the particular facts of each case; (2) whether those facts set out separate and distinct crimes; and (3) the intent of the Legislature.'”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. BRINK v. STATE