State v. Timothy E. Dobbs’s Empirical Analysis
2020
Citation profile
16 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2072
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Terry v. Ohio · Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Kumho Tire Company, Ltd., et al. v. Patrick Carmichael, Etc., et al.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“we consider: whether the suspect is handcuffed, whether a weapon is drawn, whether a frisk is performed, the manner in which the suspect is restrained, whether the suspect is moved to another location, whether questioning took place in a police vehicle, and the number of officers involved.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“search the record for reasons to sustain”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.