PARKER v. STATE’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

13 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “the term 'Indian' has a specific meaning within the ambit of federal criminal jurisdiction, one that includes both racial and political components of the Indian community.”

   4 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. WADKINS v. STATE · STATE v. BRESTER

2. “and cites to Parker v. State, 2021 OK CR 17 495 P.3d 653 Parker we stated: We afford a district court's factual findings that are supported by the record great deference and review those findings for an abuse of discretion. Young v. State, 2000 OK CR 17 12 P.3d 20 2007 OK CR 33 168 P.3d 1139 2005 OK CR 24 126 P.3d 625 2021 OK CR 17 ¶3 Once before,”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. BARKUS v. STATE · BARKUS v. STATE

3. “1) tribal enrollment; 2) government recognition formally and informally through receipt of assistance reserved only to Indians; 3) enjoyment of the benefits of tribal affiliation; and 4) social recognition as an Indian through residence on a reservation and participation in Indian social life.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. BARKUS v. STATE · BARKUS v. STATE