STATE ex rel. MATLOFF v. WALLACE’s Empirical Analysis
2021
Citation profile
23 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1153 · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Gideon v. Wainwright · Teague v. Lane · Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co. · Griffith v. Kentucky · Atkins v. Virginia
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is consistent with both the text of the opinion and the Supreme Court's apparent intent . . . The Supreme Court itself has not declared that McGirt is retroactive to convictions already final when the ruling was announced.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“McGirt announced a rule of criminal procedure . . . to recognize a long dormant (or many thought, non-existent) federal jurisdiction over major crimes committed by or against Indians in the Muscogee (Creek) Reservation.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“McGirt and our post- McGirt reservation rulings shall not apply retroactively to void a final state conviction”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.