Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2021 OK CR 39 - BENCH v. STATE

2021 OK CR 39 - BENCH v. STATE’s Empirical Analysis

2021

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
February 2026
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Rhode Island v. Innis · Harrington v. Richter · McGirt v. Oklahoma

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “sufficient information to show this Court by clear and convincing evidence the materials sought to be introduced have or are likely to have support in law and fact to be relevant to an allegation raised in the application for post-conviction relief.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “either that the outcome of the trial would have been different . . . or that the defendant is factually innocent.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.