Waupaca County v. K.E.K.’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “State ex rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane Cnty., 2004 WI 58, ¶45 , 271 Wis. 2d 633 , 681 N.W.2d 110 (internal quotations omitted). If its meaning is plain, then our inquiry ends. Id. We give statutory language”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Village of Slinger v. Polk Properties, LLC

2. “In contrast, in an as-applied challenge, we assess the merits of the challenge by considering the facts of the particular case in front of us 'not hypothetical facts in other situations.'”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 396 Wis. 2d 705 - State v. Mitchell L. Christen

3. “[w]here a statute has been authoritatively interpreted by this court, the party challenging that interpretation must establish that our prior interpretation was 'objectively wrong.'”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Village of Slinger v. Polk Properties, LLC