Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2022 Ohio 91 - State v. Carter

State v. Carter’s Empirical Analysis

2022

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
June 2022
most recently cited

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Terry v. Ohio · Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · United States v. Mendenhall · Adams v. Williams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]e cannot help but wonder——even while recognizing that police officers must make split-second decisions under circumstances where all factors may not be known——whether . . . officers have sought to find 'magic' language for their articulated facts to describe a person's behavior to [justify an investigative stop].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “We do not agree, as Carter suggests, that the officers used 'magic' words or language in testifying to establish reasonable suspicion. The court clearly found the officers' testimony to be credible, and we defer to the court's credibility assessment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Carter was observed within four minutes of the officers receiving the alert within the specific area of the alert. In other words, as in Rickmon, the stop had temporal and physical proximity to the gunfire.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.