Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 203 A.2d 140 - Roos v. Roos

Roos v. Roos’s Empirical Analysis

1964

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
4
states following
June 2015
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently June 2015

10 state decisions

40196419701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on La Rocca Trust · Miller v. Hob Tea Room · Kiser v. Lucas · Irish v. Irish · In Re duPont

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The doctrine of reformation for mistake with regard to trusts differs from instruments such as contracts in one important respect; in contract law, reformation will not be granted unless the parties’ mistake is mutual, but mutuality of mistake is not always required where trusts are concerned, in that, because a settlor usually receives no consideration for the creation of a trust, a unilateral mistake on the part of the settlor is ordinarily sufficient to warrant reformation.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.