Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 203 Ark. 614 - Wilson v. Pharris

Wilson v. Pharris’s Empirical Analysis

1942

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently March 2017

11 state decisions

4019421950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Akers v. Clark · Alexander v. de Kermel · Shirey v. Clark · Adams v. Eagle

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A remainder is an estate limited to take effect in possession immediately after the expiration of a prior estate created at the same time and by the same instrument. A “[r]eversion” is defined ... [a]s the residue of an estate left in the grantor, to commence in possession after the determination of some particular estate granted out by him.... Unlike a remainder, which must be created by deed or devise, a reversion arises only by operation of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “... At common law, if a man seised of an estate limits it to one for life, remainder to his own right heirs, they take not as remaindermen, but as reversioners; and it will be, moreover, competent for him, as being himself the reversioner, after making such a limitation, to grant away the reversion. The same result is reached when an ultimate remainder in fee is contingent. Until it vests there is a reversion in the grantor or devisor md his heirs.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.