Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 203 Ark. 699 - Cutsinger v. Strang

Cutsinger v. Strang’s Empirical Analysis

1942

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
January 1975
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently January 1975

12 state decisions

801942195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cassady v. Norris · Crittenden Lumber Co. v. McDougal · Robinson v. Indiana & Arkansas Lumber & Manufacturing Co. · Hooper v. Wist · Lambie v. W. T. Rawleigh Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““All actions against the purchaser, his heirs or assigns, for the recovery of (lands sold by any collector of the revenue for the non-payment of taxes, and for) lands sold at judicial sales shall be brought within five [5] years after the date of such sale, and not thereafter. ...””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.